Items
-
Cornwall1. Policy Statement The City of Cornwall is committed to providing a fair, consistent and efficient process while respecting the important need for public consultation and legislative approvals with respect to naming, renaming or dedication of Municipal assets such as new streets that are not part of a new subdivision, parks and facilities, as well as the major elements of such municipal assets. On occasion, Cornwall City Council may wish to acknowledge the activities and significant contributions of a person, persons, or family, to the community through the naming of a municipal asset. 3. Purpose / Application This policy establishes the processes and criteria for naming, renaming or dedicating municipal assets such as new streets that are not part of a new subdivision, parks and facilities as well as the major elements of such municipal assets, including the methods by which the public may provide suggestions and comments. This policy applies to the naming of streets that are not part of a new subdivision. The main objectives of this policy are: a. Naming municipal assets such as new streets that are not part of a new subdivision, parks and facilities as well as the major elements of such municipal assets after significant geographical, neighbourhood and historical elements. b. To recognize, on an exceptional basis, significant contributions that organizations or individuals have made to public life and the well-being of the people of Cornwall. c. To provide direction on how to apply for approval to name, re-name or dedicate a municipal asset. d. To ensure the application of a defined consultation process to encourage community participation. e. To ensure a clear, efficient, and timely naming process. f. To ensure the application of key criteria to determine the validity of a commemorative name. g. To ensure the compilation of a comprehensive Names Registry to act as one central repository for all approved names for municipal assets such as new streets that are not part of a new subdivision, parks and facilities as well as the major elements of such municipal assets. h. To ensure a proper approval process and the importance of the role of the Municipal Naming Working Group and Council approval are acknowledged. i. To provide for the Municipal Naming Working Group that is responsible for developing recommendations with respect to naming of specific municipal assets for Council's consideration. The policy applies to all City employees and persons acting on behalf of the City, as well as members of Council and the public with respect to naming of municipal assets. The policy is not intended to address: a. lndividual memorial dedications such as commemorative benches, trees, or plaques b. Naming rights and sponsorship opportunities c. The naming of streets that are part of a new subdivision d. The naming of core facilities (City Hall, fire halls, police stations, public library, etc.) e. The naming of City-owned facilities leased to commercial tenants 4. Specific Policy Requirements 4.L General Provisions The naming, renaming and dedication of Municipal assets shall be the responsibility of the Council of The Corporation of the City of Cornwall. Council may, at any time, direct that a specific name be used for a specific facility or park or element thereof. The intent of naming is for permanent recognition. The renaming of municipal assets such as new streets that are not part of a new subdivision, parks and facilities as well as the major elements of such municipal assets is strongly discouraged as it significantly impacts numerous individuals, City Departments, and the community. 4.2 Naming Principles When a Municipal asset is named, renamed, or dedicated, the following principles shall be applied: a. Names shall be unique; name duplication and similar sounding or spelled names shall be avoided. b. Names should give a sense of place, continuity, belonging and celebrate the distinguishing characteristics and uniqueness of Cornwall. c. Names should maintain a long-standing local area identification with the residents of Cornwall. d. Names should promote pride in the City of Cornwall, acknowledge local heritage, history, and recognize unique features and geography such as names that relate to local history, places, and events, native wildlife, flora, fauna and natural features or unique characteristics of a neighbourhood or area. e. The rationale associated with the use of a particular name shall be understandable to the majority of Cornwall residents. f. Names shall not be discriminatory, derogatory, or political in nature; names conveying a secondary negative or offensive connotation, any sexual overtones, inappropriate humour, slang or double meanings shall be avoided. g. Names with hyphens, apostrophes or dashes shall be discouraged but may be considered on an individual basis. h. Names may, on an exceptional basis, honour the significant contributions of an individual or family. i. Names may recognize the contributions of organizations such as a partnership with or without financial contributions. j The cost associated with a naming or renaming (including but not limited to signage, ceremonial costs, legal costs, etc.)will be the responsibility of: . the City when the naming or re-naming has been initiated by the City . the Corporate entity when the naming or re-naming has been initiated by a Corporate entity . the person or family when the naming or re-naming has been initiated by a person or family k. The City of Cornwall makes all final decisions concerning what is placed or occurs on City property and in its buildings. l. Naming in honour of elected or appointed public officials, City administrative officials or staff shall be discouraged. m. Municipal assets are not intended to provide the facilities and function of memorial purposes normally found at cemeteries. n. Council shall retain the right not to name certain facilities of broad community importance such as, but not limited to, City Hall, fire halls, police stations and public libraries. 4.3 Prioritization Priority shall be given to naming, re-naming, or dedicating Municipal assets after: a. the area or street in which the property or building is located to provide a geographical association to help the public to locate a park, bridge or building more easily b. the most dominant constant feature either within or nearby the selected site such as an associated significant ecological or natural resource feature c. an historical name related to Cornwall's heritage and historical folklore d. an event or person of international, national, or provincial significance e. an organization or individual (with the exception of public officials or City staff) to recognize: . activities and significant contributions to the community . outstanding contributions or sponsorships made toward the development or enhancement of a properly or building 4.4Specific Criteria for Commemorative Naming Where the commemorative naming of a Municipal asset is being requested, at least one of the following criteria shall apply: a. The nominated individual shall have demonstrated excellence, courage, or exceptional service to the citizens of the City of Cornwall, the Province of Ontario and/or Canada, including veterans of military conflicts. b. The nominated individual shall have an extraordinary community service record. c. The nominated individual shall have worked to foster equality and reduce discrimination. d. A direct relationship or association that existed between the place of residence of or community efforts undertaken by the individual and the property, building or element to be named. e. An individual may be recognized for a significant financial contribution to an asset, where that contribution significantly benefits the community that the asset serves. f . The nominated name has historical significance. 4.5 Character When naming an asset after a person who has made significant contributions to public life and the well-being of the people of Cornwall, character shall be evaluated on the individual's stable moral qualities based on the following virtues: Humility People with humility are open minded. They solicit and consider the views others. They lean from others. They can reflect critically on their failures, and, as such, they become better leaders. lntegrity People with integrity can build good relationship with their collaborators, with their superiors, or with their allies or partners. Collaboration People who collaborate achieve the worthwhile goals that require more than individual effort and skills. They use the diversity of knowledge, experience, perceptions, judgements, and skills available through collaboration to make better decisions and to better execute decisions. When people respect the views of others, they build good relationships with others. Justice People with a sense of justice are able to understand the issues of social inequality and the challenges associated with being fair or evenhanded. When leaders act fairly, they empower employees, collaborators, customers, governments, and regulators react positively. Courage People with courage stand up to the poor decisions made by others. Having courage also means perseverance and tenacity required to work through difficult issues. Temperance People with temperance do not take uncalculated risks, rush to judgement, fail to gather relevant facts, and have a sense of proportion. They do not change their minds and alter their decisions. Accountability People who are accountable commit to, or owrì, the decisions they make and can secure the commitment of others. They demonstration initiative. They take responsibility for poor outcomes and do not blame others. Humanity People who show humanity are able to relate to people, to see situations from the perspectives of other people or to take account the impact of their decisions on others. With humility, a person will act in socially responsible ways. Transcendence With transcendence, the goals of a person are broad. These people see the bigger picture. They do not get ovennrhelm with petty rivalries, personal feelings, and past failures. Drive With drive and the passion, dynamism, and vigour associated with drive, a person exerts the mental and physical effort it takes to become successful, to motivate others to excel and to create value in others. Judgment With judgement, the overriding virtue, people make good decisions, even when they need to move quickly in ambiguous situations and when they are faced with the many paradoxes that confront all leaders from time to time. Where the name of an individual or organization is so used, approval shall be obtained from the individual (their family) or the organization for such naming. 4.6Single Use A commemorative name should only be used once. 4,7 No Memorials This policy is not open to commemorate an individual's death which may include flowers, floral arrangements, images, signs, tokens, religious offerings, etc. These applications will be directed to the Commemorative Tree Program. 4.8 Municipal Names Registry All approved names from the Municipal Names Registry for use associated with municipal assets will be listed publicly on the City's website: Cornwall.ca. 5. Procedures Naming municipally owned assets such as parks and facilities as well as the major elements of such municipal assets, including major elements thereof shall follow the following procedures. a. All requests for naming a municipal asset are to be submitted in writing by completing the Naming Application Form available as Appendix "A" to this Policy, and all supporting documentation as follows: . Background information concerning the rationale for consideration of the request. . Biographical information if the proposed name is based on an individual or organization. . Documentation, including letters from organizations, sponsors and individuals providing substantial support for the request. . Written endorsement from the closest relative or next of kin if the proposed name is based on an individual who is deceased unless the individual is a national or international figure. . ln the case of a name change, the application should also include a signed endorsement from not less than seventy five percent (75%) of property owners (one per landowner), representing a clear majority of stakeholders identifying the name, address and signatures of the persons who own property that front on or is adjacent to the subject street. b. The City Clerk will review all names submitted for conformity with the criteria. c. lf all requirements have been met, the City Clerk will circulate the name submitted to City Departments for comment. d. lf all requirements have been met, the City Clerk will coordinate a meeting with the Municipal Naming Working Group. e. The Municipal Naming Working Group will review names submitted for conformity with the criteria and consider comments received from City Departments. f . lf the Municipal Naming Working Group determines that the application has met the requirements of the Policy at this stage of the process, the City Clerk will facilitate notice and public consultation with respect to the proposed name. g. The City Clerk will then coordinate a meeting with the Municipal Naming Working Group to review comments from external stakeholders and the public with respect to the proposed name. h. The Municipal Naming Working Group will rate the application based on the naming principles, prioritization and specific criteria giving special consideration to character when the request is to name a municipal asset after a person. i. The Municipal Naming Working Group will provide its recommendations with respect to the proposed naming of municipal assets. j lf the Municipal Naming Working Group determines that the application has not met the requirements of this Policy, the City Clerk will advise the applicant and the process will be considered to have been completed. k. lf the Municipal Naming Working Group determines that the application has met the requirements of this Policy, the City Clerk will prepare reports for Council's consideration with respect to the proposed naming of municipal assets. l. All discussions of commemorative naming of parks, facilities or assets will be considered initially at a closed Meeting of Council for the purpose of discussing any personal information and gaining approval, in principle, of the majority of Council. Final decisions will be made by Council at an open Meeting of Council. m. The City Clerk will advise applicants of any Council decisions with respect to a proposed name. n. The City Clerk will maintain the Municipal Names Registry in conjunction with the Planning Division and Héritage-Patrimoine Cornwall. 5. 1 Public Consultation Public notice and public consultation shall be undertaken in accordance with the size and scope of the Municipal asset being named, and in consultation with the Municipal Naming Working Group. The public consultation period shall last a minimum of 30 calendar days. Written submissions received during the public consultation phase must be verifiable. a. A submission must include the name of the person or persons making it, their address and telephone number (email address is optional). b. A submission may be submitted by affected citizens who currently reside in the City of Cornwall and who are at least 18 years of age. c. Submissions must be legible, typewritten or printed in ink (no pencil). d. Submissions must be appropriate and respectful in tone and must not contain any improper or offensive language or information. e. Submissions will be considered a public document and that information contained in it may be subject to the scrutiny of the City and other members of the general public. 5.2 Renaming The names of municipal assets named commemoratively should not be changed unless it is found that the individual's personal character is or was such that the continued use of their name for an asset would not be in the best interest of the community. Should a municipal asset be renamed, the process shall be identical to the naming process. 5.3 Exception ln keeping with its powers set out in the Municipal Act, 2001, Council may assign a commemorative name by resolution, notwithstanding the provisions included in the Municipal Naming Policy. 5.4 Limitations The policy is not intended to address: a. lndividual memorial dedications such as commemorative benches, trees or plaques b. Naming rights / Sponsorship opportunities (addressed under a separate policy) c. The naming of city owned facilities leased to commercial tenants d. The naming of Core facilities (City Hall, fire halls, police stations and public libraries) 5.5 Municipal Naming Working Group The Municipal Naming Working Group shall include the following representatives: . General Manager, Corporate Services . City Clerk . General Manager and/or Division Manager, lnfrastructure and Municipal Works . General Manager and/or Division Manager, Department of Planning, Development and Recreation .
-
CoronadoCITY COUNCIL MEETINGCORONADO, CALIFORNIATUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1984 (p. 1)Regular City Council meeting was held at 3:00 p.m. (p. 1)Present: Councilmembers Adams, Ewen, Herron, Odiorne and Mayor Callahan (p. 1)Absent: None (p. 1)Also Present: City Manager Ray Silver; City Attorney Roger Krauel (p. 1)2. Rev. Jon Freeberg, Graham Memorial Presbyterian Church, gave the invocation and Mayor Callahan led in the pledge of allegiance. (p. 1)3. COMMUNICATIONS - ORAL: (p. 1)a. Elizabeth Hornick, 369 Palm Avenue, appeared before the city council and requested the city council to take a position to repeal Senate Bill 813 relating to additional taxes on property owners. (p. 1) The city council requested the staff to obtain a copy of Senate Bill 813 before it takes a position on this bill and make a report to the city council by the next council meeting. (p. 1)b. Warren Nielsen, 3885 Birch Street, San Diego, appeared before the council and read a prepared statement questioning the Mayor's appearance offering testimony against the Harborview Community Council at the Coastal Commission's hearing for a 5.4 acre park. (p. 1)b. At the request of Mayor Callahan, a non agenda item was placed on the agenda as item 9g, re Tidelands Presentation at Coastal Commission. (p. 1) Motion of Callahan, seconded by Odiorne and carried, all voting aye. (p. 1)c. At the request of Council Member Odiorne, a non agenda item was placed on the agenda as item 9h, entitled Shoreline Erosion Committee Report and Action; it was also moved the item be given a time certain of 3:30 p.m. (p. 1) Motion of Odiorne, seconded by Ewen and carried, all voting aye. (p. 1)d. Council Member Herron announced that a number of local organizations: Coronado Beautiful, the Residential Association, Share Our Sentiments, the Citizens Committee on Traffic, and the Coronado Historical Association, will be conducting a workshop on design standards referred to as CITES (Citizens for Improved Types of Environment Standards) on Monday, (p. 1)Page 8142April 9, 1984, at 7:00 p.m., at the Coronado city hall; the public was invited to attend the meeting to give their input. (p. 2)Mayor Callahan reported that on April 11, 1984, the State Department of Parks and Recreation will be conducting a meeting in city hall at 1:00 p.m., to discuss Alpha Beach, the 40 acre parcel leased by the State Parks and Recreation Department from the Navy for developing an overnight and related day-use facilities as an addition to the Silver Strand State Beach. (p. 2) The public was invited to attend. (p. 2)4. MINUTES: Minutes of the regular meeting of March 20, 1984, a copy having been delivered to each member of the city council prior to meeting, were amended as follows: Under agenda item 14a, the vote on the motion directing the city manager to sign the option agreement to begin the process, was changed from Aye to Nay for both Council Members Adams and Odiorne. (p. 2) The minutes, as amended, were approved and the reading waived. (p. 2) Motion of Callahan, seconded by Ewen and carried, all voting aye. (p. 2)5. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None. (p. 2)The city council considered agenda item 9h at this time. (p. 2)Shoreline Erosion Committee Report and Action. (p. 2)Council Member Odiorne informed the city council that he attended a meeting of the subject committee on March 30 and gave a brief report on the work that was going on in connection with shoreline erosion and the study the Corps of Engineers was conducting to obtain data that might alleviate the situation. (p. 2) Briefly, the Corps of Engineers is conducting a semiannual aerial survey of the California coast, from the Mexican border to Dana Point, to determine where beach erosion and accretion is taking place. (p. 2) Council Member Odiorne also read a letter from the Commanding Officer of the Navy Amphibious Base in Coronado, reporting on the navy's off-shore beach replenishment plan. (p. 2) Council Member Odiorne was of the opinion the city should be part of the program as well and other interested parties such as the Hotel del Coronado and the Coronado Shores. (p. 2)Council Member Odiorne - moved that the Mayor contact the Coronado Shores, the Hotel del Coronado, to set up a meeting, with representatives of the Corps of Engineers, the Naval Amphibious Base, (p. 2)Page 8143and Woodward and Clyde as soon as possible, for the purpose of making some arrangements to get in on this sand replenishment project. (p. 3) Motion seconded by Adams and carried, all voting aye. (p. 3)In connection with the above motion, Mayor Callahan stated he would write the letter indicating that Council Member Odiorne representing the city would chair the meeting and that every effort will be made to notify the public when the meeting is to be held. (p. 3)The council resumed regular order of the agenda. (p. 3)6. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS: (p. 3)a. Request to Extend the Abatement Period Regarding a Church and School at 1407 Fourth Street and 338 Pomona Avenue (Carter, Lenora; Block 116, Lot 4, CBSI). (p. 3) The staff informed the city council that a church and school was being conducted on the subject location without proper planning and zoning approvals and in violation of the zoning ordinance. (p. 3) After several abatement periods were granted by the staff, the owner of the property applied to the city council for an administrative hearing and requested an additional 120 day extension to the abatement period granted by the staff. (p. 3) The staff recommended that the city council not grant the 120 extension but require that all church and school activities cease operation at the end of a 30 day period beginning April 3, 1984. (p. 3)Rev. Helen L. Carter appeared before the council and after being duly sworn, described the activities at the school and church and requested the 120 extension of the abatement period. (p. 3) Tony Pena, Director of Community Development, was duly sworn and presented the city council with testimony on the alleged violation. (p. 3)The council members discussed this matter at some length and there was a consensus to permit Rev. Carter to continue the school until such as the school term for the public schools end on or about June 14; There was also a consensus that Rev. Carter sign an agreement that she is willing to abate the violation of the zoning ordinance; and that during this grace period Rev. Carter was requested to apply for the necessary special use permit process. (p. 3)Mayor Callahan - moved that the city council allow Mrs. Carter to continue her school until June 14, provided Rev. Carter signs an agreement with the city to abate the violation at present location. (p. 3) Motion seconded by Ewen. (p. 3)Page 8144After questions presented by the city attorney, Rev. Carter agreed to cease the school use by June 14 and not reinstitute the school use without first obtaining a special use permit. (p. 4) The city attorney suggested a motion for council consideration, and Mayor Callahan amended his motion and - moved that the city council direct the staff to take no further abatement proceedings until June 15, pending an agreement with Rev. Carter to abate the violation. (p. 4) Amended motion seconded by Ewen and carried, all voting aye. (p. 4)It was recommended to Mrs. Carter that she apply for a special use permit to operate her school. (p. 4) In connection with the operation of the church, Council Member Ewen - moved the city council direct staff not to take any further abatement action for the next 120 days subject to an agreement being signed by Rev. Carter that she will not operate the church without a special use permit. (p. 4) Motion seconded by Herron and carried, all voting aye. (p. 4)7. CONSENT CALENDAR: The city council approved, adopted and/or accepted agenda items 9a, 11b, 11c, 12a, and 14a, on the consent calendar. (p. 4) Motion of Callahan, seconded by Ewen and carried, all voting aye. (p. 4)8. COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE REPORTS: (p. 4)a. Appeal of Planning Commission Decision Denying Variance for sign - 1099 1st Street (Watt Industries). (p. 4) The planning commission denied a variance for a 10 foot high 70 square foot sign for "The Landing" project at 1st Street and Orange Avenue, which is 6 feet higher and is 58 square feet in excess of the requirements of the sign ordinance. (p. 4) Mr. Stephen Games, representing the applicant, Watt Industries San Diego, Inc., appealed the decision to the city council. (p. 4)Mr. Games appeared before the city council and reported that the Design Review Commission approved the sign and presented photographs of other signs in the city which Mr. Games claimed were in excess of the requirements of the sign ordinance. (p. 4) The sign would remain for a period of at least thirteen months, and possibly longer. (p. 4)Page 8145Staff reported that similar larger signs in the City are conforming because of approval with either a Special Use Permit or with approval of the Design Review Committee under authority of the sign ordinance. (p. 5)The council discussed this matter with Mr. Games and after some negotiation with the applicant on the size of the sign, a compromise was reached. (p. 5) Council Member Ewen then - moved the city council approve one sign not to exceed twenty-five square feet for a period of thirteen months, and that the sign be no higher than the height of the fence. (p. 5) Motion seconded by Adams. (p. 5)The staff interjected remarks that if the council is going to grant a sign in excess of the dimensions of the sign ordinance, that findings must first be determined. (p. 5) Council Member Ewen claimed that the special circumstances is the larger lot and the temporary use permitted for the sign. (p. 5) The city attorney further explained: that the city council can modify the action taken by the planning commission; that it can grant the application on condition that only one twenty-five square foot sign be erected for the three lots under construction; and that in so doing it incorporate the staff's findings proposed in the agenda material. (p. 5) To comply with the reduced measurements of the sign, the applicant then requested a rewording of the sign but did not want to go through the regular city procedure. (p. 5) The council concurred and the rewording of the sign is to be approved by the city manager and the department of community development. (p. 5)The question was called for the motion on the floor. (p. 5) The motion was repeated and carried. (p. 5)Ayes: Ewen, Adams, Odiorne, Callahan (p. 5)Nays: Herron (p. 5)b. Continuation of Appeal Regarding Planning Commission Interpretation on Residential and Commercial Dish or Satellite Antennas and Receivers. (p. 5) This item was a continuation of the appeal by Steven Larson representing William Brown, regarding interpretation of Section 19.02.128 of the Municipal Code. (p. 5) The staff reported that the planning commission had made a determination that the language "Radio or television transmitters or similar facilities," does not include dishes and antenna satellites and receivers, and that these facilities are subject to the special use permit process. (p. 5) The staff recommended the council adopt a (p. 5)Page 8146resolution approving the planning commission's recommendation. (p. 6) The staff also reported that the council's previous action established a period of six months to conduct a workshop to study what the effect of such satellite antennas and (antenna) receivers would have on the community, and the necessity for an ordinance. (p. 6) After some discussion, the council agreed to waive the $500.00 fee for a Special Use Permit in this case since there would no doubt not be another in the six month period. (p. 6) Staff suggested that applicants for ham radio equipment antennas be allowed to pay for the public hearing notices ($40.00 per notice). (p. 6)A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORONADO REGARDING AN INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 19.54.230I (SPECIAL USES CONSIDERED, OF THE CORONADO ZONING ORDINANCE) was read by title, the reading in its entirety unanimously waived and adopted as RESOLUTION NO. 6328. (p. 6) Motion of Callahan, seconded by Ewen, and carried, all voting aye. (p. 6)Mayor Callahan - moved that during this period of time the fees for special use permit be waived for any person applying for a radio amateur antenna. (p. 6) Motion seconded by Odiorne, and carried all voting aye. (p. 6)John Baker, 630 A Avenue, representing the Coronado Amateur Radio Society, appeared before the council, and stated that he is actively involved with amateur radio operators' organizations and asked to be included on the Task Force Committee for this workshop. (p. 6) Mr. Baker was informed he would be included. (p. 6)c. Policy Committee Recommendation Re Naming of Parks. (p. 6) Staff reported the City Council requested the Citizens Advisory Panel and the Recreation Commission to study the issue of assigning names of parks after citizens, prompted by the suggestion of Dr. Vernetti, who requested that the council rename Jacinto Park after Dr. William Paul Vetter. (p. 6) It was the recommendation of the Citizens Advisory Panel that parks not be named after citizens and the Recreation Commission recommended that a park be named after a citizen posthumously. (p. 6) The council considered which policy to adopt and whether to adopt a policy before or after considering the request received to name a park after former mayor Paul Vetter. (p. 6)Page 8147Council Member Herron - moved that the city council rename Jacinto Park after Dr. Wm. Paul Vetter. (p. 7) Motion seconded by Odiorne and carried. (p. 7)Ayes: Herron, Odiorne, Adams, Ewen (p. 7)Nays: Callahan (p. 7)Council Member Herron then - moved the city council adopt the Citizens Advisory Panel's recommendation as the city's policy, from here on, of naming parks for citizens. (p. 7) Motion seconded by Adams and carried, all voting aye. (p. 7)9. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS: (p. 7)a. (Consent Calendar). Approval of Warrants. (p. 7) The council ordered paid Warrants Nos. 30639 through 30821 and Warrants Nos. 26832 through 26840, as audited and approved by the Audit Committee, provided there are sufficient funds on hand. (p. 7) Motion of Callahan, seconded by Odiorne and carried, all voting aye. (p. 7)b. Legislative Report. (p. 7) Staff reported on two items. (p. 7) The first issue is one of the Public Utilities Commission. (p. 7) Due to deregulation in the State of California, the PUC is no longer serving notice to affected cities or special districts, such as the Strand Express Agency, regarding applications for common carrier permits. (p. 7) Strand Express requested the PUC to mail a copy of the transportation calendar to monitor applications, as is a requirement for applicants. (p. 7) PUC responded with a charge for the calendar of $75, undermining the cities' right to be informed. (p. 7) Staff asked that the Mayor write a letter to the PUC asking to be informed regularly of these applications. (p. 7)Mayor Callahan - moved that the City Council approve that a letter be written to the PUC, as recommended by Staff. (p. 7) Motion seconded by Odiorne and carried, all voting aye. (p. 7)Council Member Ewen, who sits on the Transit Organizational Structure Study Policy Committee of SANDAG, gave a report on a meeting held to discuss Metropolitan Development Board (MTDB) policy board options. (p. 7) Council Member Ewen reported on the weighted vote formula on the Metropolitan Transportation Development Board; a copy of the proposed weighted formula is on file in the office of the city (p. 7)Page 8148clerk. (p. 8) Council Member Ewen informed the council that the City of San Diego was requesting the veto power, and requested guidance from the city council on the city's position. (p. 8) The council was unanimous in having Council Member Ewen continue to make certain that the weighted vote formula adopted by SANDAG be used and that every effort be made to adhere to the one member one vote policy. (p. 8)c. Letter from William R. Cook, Jr., M.D. Re Proposed Hotel for Crown Isle. (p. 8) The city received a letter dated March 27, 1984 regarding the city naming itself as the lead agency to evaluate prospective environmental impacts associated with the proposed development at Crown Isle. (p. 8) Council Member Adams asked the staff to report on the proposed development of Crown Isle at the Coronado Cays. (p. 8) Mayor Callahan read a letter from Joel Enterprises which asked that this discussion be continued to April 17th, when Mr. and Mrs. Citron will be able to attend. (p. 8) No action was taken on the request because no particular project or development would be discussed. (p. 8) Council Member Adams was of the opinion that the City should take the lead role on environmental controls on any development in the city. (p. 8) Staff reported that to be a lead agency, a written contract should be written to the Port District outlining certain criteria on which to base the city's request. (p. 8)Council Member Adams - moved the council direct the staff to come back to council in two weeks from now on the procedures for the City of Coronado to be the lead agency for any kind of development on Crown Isle. (p. 8) Motion seconded by Herron and carried, all voting aye. (p. 8)d. Proposed Guidelines for Holding Workshops. (p. 8) Council Member Ewen presented the council with several guidelines for a workshop format and recommended they be included in the Commissioner's Handbook as additional guidelines to be followed. (p. 8) A copy of the guidelines is on file in the office of the city clerk. (p. 8)Council Member Ewen - moved the city council add the guidelines to the Commissioner's Handbook at the next revision. (p. 8) Motion seconded by Herron and carried, all voting aye. (p. 8)e. RFP for Snack Bar Operation at Golf Course Clubhouse. (p. 8) Staff reported on letters from Coronado residents with an interest in the Golf Course Snack Bar concession. (p. 8) The Staff recommended that the city councilPage 8149direct the staff to advertise and solicit proposals for the purpose of selecting an operator for the food concession at the Coronado Golf Course. (p. 9) The staff also requested whether an expanded facility should be reviewed and considered by the Golf Course Capital Improvement Committee. (p. 9)Mayor Callahan - moved that the city council direct the staff to review the RFP for the snack bar operation. (p. 9) Motion seconded by Adams and carried, all voting aye. (p. 9)f. Closed Session - Litigation. (p. 9) At 5:10 p.m., the city council recessed into closed session for a litigation matter and reconvened at 5:30 p.m. (p. 9)g. Tidelands Presentation at the Coastal Commission on 12 April 1984. (p. 9) This matter will be presented to the Coastal Commission, at 9:00 a.m. on April 12, 1984, in Los Angeles and Mayor Callahan stated the city should have presentation at the meeting. (p. 9) Funding is needed for two or three members, preferably one staff member and two Council Members, as needed for the presentation. (p. 9)Mayor Callahan - moved that three council members and one staff, as designated, be provided with air transportation to and from Los Angeles for the purpose of presentation of the Tidelands issue at the Coastal Commission. (p. 9) Motion seconded by Adams and carried, all voting aye. (p. 9)In connection with above, Council Members Ewen and Herron, and Mayor Callahan were designated to attend. (p. 9)10. CITY ATTORNEY: None. (p. 9)11. CITY MANAGER: (p. 9)a. Council Directed Actions. (p. 9) The city manager submitted an up-to-date list of items that the city council directed staff to accomplish: i.e., (1) Goodman Estate Prescriptive Rights Questionnaire; (2) Coronado Yacht Club Negotiations; (3) Status of Vector Control Contract; and item (4) had an Event/Use Packet attached for the Coronado Fourth of July Parade for review and comments. (p. 9)b. (Consent Calendar). Award of Contract for Police and Fire Stations Parking Lot Paving. (p. 9) The staff informed the council the city received eight bids for the subject project. (p. 9) The bidders and the amounts bid are listed below: (p. 9)Page 8150Oliver Matthews Construction Co. — $6,745.70 (p. 10)Scibilia & Sons Eng. Contractors — $7,094.50 (p. 10)ABC Construction Co. — $7,290.00 (p. 10)Sim J. Harris Co. — $7,605.35 (p. 10)Aztec Paving, Inc. — $8,079.60 (p. 10)Capitol Paving, Inc. — $8,142.90 (p. 10)Reynolds Construction, Inc. — $8,405.00 (p. 10)Southland Sealing-Striping — $8,571.50 (p. 10)The staff recommended that the city council award the contract to Oliver Matthews Construction Company in the amount of $6,745.70. (p. 10) The city council approved the staff recommendation. (p. 10) Motion of Callahan, seconded by Odiorne and carried, all voting aye. (p. 10)c. (Consent Calendar). Award of Contract for City Hall Reroof. (p. 10) The staff informed the council that the city was unable to obtain a bid after advertising on three separate occasions and that the city contacted a specific roofing company named Standard Roof Company to provide the service. (p. 10) The staff made certain that the quality of the roofing materials to be used, the guarantees, bonds, and maintenance agreement proposed by the contractor were satisfactory. (p. 10) The staff recommended that the city council authorize the execution of a reroofing contract with the Standard Roof Company in the amount of $12,514.00 from account 100-1130-3810. (p. 10) The city council approved the staff recommendation. (p. 10) Motion of Callahan, seconded by Odiorne and carried, all voting aye. (p. 10)12. COMMUNICATIONS - WRITTEN: (p. 10)a. (Consent Calendar). Letter from Coronado Men's Club re Waiver of Golf Fees for Sports Celebrity Tournament. (p. 10) The Coronado Men's Golf Club requested a waiver of green fees for celebrity guests playing in the May 28 tournament. (p. 10) The staff recommended that the city council approve the waiver of green fees for celebrities playing in the 4th Annual Celebrity Guest Tournament. (p. 10) The city council approved the staff recommendation. (p. 10) Motion of Callahan, seconded by Odiorne and carried, all voting aye. (p. 10)b. Letter from Coronado Citizens' Committee on Traffic Re SANDAG Report: NAS-Coronado Commuter Access Plan. (p. 10) Staff reported on action of the Traffic Commit- (p. 10)Page 8151tee at their meeting of March 22, 1984 to review the SANDAG Report. (p. 11) The Dunham Reilly Plan was received just two days previously and, hence, there was not sufficient time to review this Plan along with the SANDAG proposal. (p. 11) The staff requested that this material be presented to the Traffic Committee for review at their April 26 meeting. (p. 11)Mayor Callahan - moved that the city council refer this information to the Traffic Committee for consideration. (p. 11) Motion seconded by Odiorne and carried, all voting aye. (p. 11)13. RESOLUTIONS: (p. 11)a. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORONADO INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX (MUNICIPAL REORGANIZATION) NORTH ISLAND NAVAL AIR STATION TO THE CITY OF CORONADO was read by title, the reading in its entirety unanimously waived and adopted as RESOLUTION NO. 6329. (p. 11) Motion of Callahan, seconded by Odiorne and carried, all voting aye. (p. 11)14. ORDINANCES: (p. 11)a. (Consent Calendar). AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CORONADO TO AMEND MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 19.56.580 REGULATING ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK was read by title, the reading in its entirety unanimously waived. (p. 11) The Ordinance, having been placed on first reading the meeting of March 20, 1984, was adopted as ORDINANCE NO. 1596. (p. 11) Motion of Callahan, seconded by Odiorne and carried, all voting aye. (p. 11)Council adjourned at 6:55 p.m. (p. 11)Approved: May 1, 1984 (p. 11)(Signed) Mayor Callahan (p. 11)Attest:
-
CosíoCÓDIGO MUNICIPAL DE COSÍO, AGS. Última Reforma Publicada en la Primera Sección del Periódico Oficial del Estado, el lunes 25 de febrero de 2019. Código publicado en la Segunda Sección del Periódico Oficial del Estado de Aguascalientes, el lunes 19 de marzo de 2007. LIBRO SEGUNDO DEL HONORABLE AYUNTAMIENTO TITULO OCTAVO DE LAS COMISIONES APARTADO DECIMO SEGUNDO De la Comisión de Nomenclaturas ARTICULO 200.- Son obligaciones y atribuciones de la Comisión de Nomenclaturas: I.- La relación, proposición y dictaminación relativa a los estudios técnicos necesarios para estructurar de acuerdo con los sistemas más modernos la nomenclatura de todo el municipio, así como el control de la misma; II.- Proponer al Ayuntamiento la uniformidad que se estime pertinente en cuanto a las características de la nomenclatura externa domiciliaria y comercial; y III.- En general, presentará los planes y lineamientos que se estimen apropiados sobre la materia, procurando conservar los nombres de las calles tradicionales suprimiendo duplicidad en el momento de proponer nuevos nombres. LIBRO SEPTIMO DEL DESARROLLO URBANO CAPITULO SEPTIMO De la Nomenclatura y Números Oficiales ARTICULO 1041.- La asignación, instalación rectificación y cambio de nomenclatura y de números oficiales de cualquier vialidad, parque, plaza monumento histórico o lugar que lo requiera que se realice en el Municipio de Cosío, se hará sujetándose a las disposiciones del presente Capítulo, que tiene por objeto: I.- Definir las reglas a que deberán sujetarse las iniciativas y acciones relacionadas con la asignación, rectificación y trámite para la obtención de números oficiales; y II.- Establecer los procedimientos para la asignación, instalación, rectificación y cambio de nomenclatura y números oficiales. ARTICULO 1042.- Sólo se otorgará nomenclatura o números oficiales a vialidades, parques, jardines, plazas, sitios y monumentos históricos, ubicados en asentamientos humanos regularizados. ARTICULO 1043.- Para efectos de este Capítulo, se entenderá por: I.- Nomenclatura: Los nombres o denominaciones asignadas por el Municipio a vialidades, parques, jardines plazas, sitios y monumentos históricos; II.- Número Oficial: Es la identificación a través de dígitos y letras, asignados de forma progresiva a las construcciones dentro de un predio, cuyo frente tenga acceso a la vía pública; III.- Directorio de Vialidades: Es el inventario de la nomenclatura asignada a las vialidades, parques, jardines, plazas y monumentos históricos, y todos los lugares públicos factibles de darles denominación relacionado a un anexo gráfico; y IV.- Padrón de Números Oficiales: Es el registro de números oficiales, asignados a las construcciones del Municipio. ARTICULO 1044.- La nomenclatura urbana se concibe como una expresión de la cultura donde se rescata lo importante de la historia, costumbres, personajes y todo acontecimiento que se puede preservar como acervo de la sociedad. ARTICULO 1045.- La colocación de nomenclatura en vialidades deberá hacerse a través de materiales no corrosivos, poco intemperizables y de difícil destrucción, sin que se permita la pinta de muros, guarniciones o banquetas, las placas deberán permitir una fácil lectura a una distancia de veinte metros, debiendo contener el nombre de la calle, avenida o boulevard, el Código Postal y el nombre de la colonia o fraccionamiento de que se trate, deberán además apegarse a lo siguiente: I.- En intersección de dos vialidades un mínimo de cuatro placas; y, II.- En intersecciones mayores a dos vialidades, una placa por cada calle antes y después de la intersección. ARTICULO 1046.- Los promoventes de vivienda y fraccionadores, deberán presentar ante la Dirección de Obras Públicas y Planeación Municipal, la propuesta de nomenclatura y vialidades, parques, jardines, plazas y/o monumentos históricos, así como de cualquier otro lugar público factible de denominación dentro de tres días hábiles siguientes a la solicitud de autorización presentada ante la Comisión Estatal de Desarrollo Urbano o a la Secretaría de Planeación del Estado, según sea el caso. ARTICULO 1047.- La Dirección de Obras Públicas, tomará en cuenta la propuesta del promovente o fraccionador al momento de determinar sobre la nomenclatura, debiéndose apegar a lo siguiente: I.- Análisis de la propuesta de los promoventes y fraccionadores, expresando las razones que se tomaron en cuenta para estimar o desestimar dicha opinión; II.- Velar porque exista una adecuada jerarquía vial y compatibilidad en el contexto urbano con la nomenclatura; III.- Evitar la duplicidad con la nomenclatura existente; IV.- Cuando se trate de la prolongación de vialidades por la dimensión de su traza o por la importancia de su uso sean jerarquizadas como primarias o secundarias, deberá de permanecer con su nomenclatura existente; y V.- Cuando se trate de la prolongación de vialidades que por la dimensión de su traza o por la importancia de su uso sean jerarquizadas como colectoras o locales, hasta en tanto no conecten con una vialidad primaria o secundaria, deberá permanecer con su nomenclatura existente. ARTICULO 1048.- Cuando exista la propuesta o solicitud de cambio de nomenclatura se deberá respetar lo siguiente: I.- Si se trata de nomenclaturas en vialidades, parques, jardines y plazas y monumentos históricos, la solicitud deberá ser formulada por escrito, anexando una relación que contenga, nombre, domicilio y firma de los peticionarios; Cuando el tiempo de asignación de la nomenclatura sea menor de diez años el porcentaje de aceptación será como mínimo del cincuenta un (sic) por ciento de los residentes; y II.- Si se trata de nomenclatura en parques, jardines, sitios o monumentos históricos y todos los lugares públicos factibles de darles denominación con arraigo e identidad cultural adquiridas a través de un tiempo mayor a diez años; la propuesta será acompañada de una relación que contenga por cada inmueble el nombre completo, domicilio y firma de aceptación como mínimo del sesenta por ciento de los residentes de la zona en un radio de tres cuadras. Cuando el tiempo de asignación de la nomenclatura sea menor a diez años el porcentaje de aceptación será como mínimo diez años, el porcentaje de aceptación será como mínimo del cincuenta y un por ciento de los residentes de la zona en un radio tres cuadras. ARTICULO 1049.- Las solicitudes de asignación, rectificación o cambio de nomenclatura deberán reunir los siguientes requisitos: I.- Serán presentadas por escrito señalando los hechos y motivos que las apoyan; II.- Tratándose de hombre o personajes ilustres, deberán acompañarse con los documentos que contengan la biografía que justifique la trascendencia de la propuesta; y III.- Los nombres propuestos no deberán contravenir a la moral y las buenas costumbres. ARTICULO 1050.- Toda solicitud de nomenclatura deberán apegarse al siguiente procedimiento: I.- Presentada la solicitud por escrito a la Dirección de Obras Públicas Municipal emitirá dictamen positivo o negativo en base a lo establecido en este Libro y demás disposiciones jurídicas aplicables; II.- Cuando se dictamine improcedente la solicitud deberá notificarse personalmente al promovente; III.- Cuando el dictamen sea positivo se turnará a la Secretaría del H. Ayuntamiento, para incorporarlo a la orden del día de la siguiente sesión ordinaria de Cabildo; IV.- Sometida a la consideración del Cabildo se propondrá para su aprobación; y V.- Una vez dictada la resolución definitiva se notificará a los interesados. ARTICULO 1051.- Todo cambio o asignación de nomenclatura y números oficiales deberá ser notificado de inmediato a las Administraciones Fiscales de Hacienda y a los Directores de Catastro e Impuesto a la Propiedad Raíz; del Registro Público de la Propiedad y Comercio; de Finanzas del Municipio; y a cualquier otra persona física o moral que lo requiera. ARTICULO 1052.- La instalación de números oficiales deberá apegarse a lo siguiente: I.- En inmuebles construidos deberán colocarse en el exterior, al frente de la construcción junto al acceso principal; II.- En los condominios horizontales públicos o privados, se asignará un solo número oficial exterior y una numeración progresiva en el interior para cada vivienda o local; III.- En condominios públicos o privados de tipo mixto, se asignará un solo número exterior y para su interior se establecerá una letra por edificio y una numeración progresiva por cada vivienda o local; IV.- Los números oficiales en ningún caso deberán ser pintados sobre muros, bloques, columnas y/o en elementos de fácil destrucción. Deberán además ser de materiales no degradables con la intemperie; V.- Las placas deberán ser de tipo de fuente legible y permitir una fácil lectura a un mínimo de veinte metros; VI.- La numeración deberá ser progresiva al inicio de la vialidad y con un mínimo de veinte metros; VII.- Para cada manzana se deberá reiniciar la numeración progresiva, con el número de la centena siguiente; VIII.- La secuencia de la asignación deberá otorgarse desde el primer número en pares para la acera izquierda y en nones para la acera derecha, teniendo siempre como orientación al número ciento uno como el primero para la construcción de la acera derecha, tomando como referencia de orientación del inicio el centro de la ciudad a partir de los siguientes ejes: IX.- Las placas de numeración deberán colocarse en una altura mínima de dos metros y un máximo de dos metros con cincuenta centímetros a partir del nivel de la banqueta; X.- Cuando existan manzanas con diferente longitud, deberá prevalecer la numeración progresiva que dicte la manzana de mayor longitud; XI.- Cuando exista longitud en manzanas con traslapes constantes, la asignación de la numeración quedará sujeta al dictamen que emita la Dirección de Obras Públicas; y XII.- Cuando las cabeceras de manzanas de una glorieta, plaza o sitio que cuente con nomenclatura propia y existan varias construcciones, con acceso desde éstas, se asignará una nueva numeración en nones con una solo centena bajo la nomenclatura de la glorieta, plaza o sitio que corresponda. ARTICULO 1053.- Los particulares, promoventes o fraccionadores deberán presentar solicitud por escrito para la asignación de números oficiales que contendrán: I.- Cuando se trate de un fraccionamiento o condominio el original o maduro con dos copias del piano del fraccionamiento con dos copias del plano del fraccionamiento o condominio, con certificación de la autorización de la Comisión Estatal de Desarrollo Urbano o de la Secretaría de Planeación del Estado según sea el caso; copia de escritura pública de las áreas de donación a favor del H. Ayuntamiento; recibo del pago de derechos municipales por las obras de urbanización; y, recibo de pago de los derechos por asignación de números oficiales; II.- Cuando se trate de propietarios de predios individuales, copia certificada del documento que acredite la propiedad, copia del último pago de impuesto predial, constancia de alineamiento y compatibilidad urbanística; III.- Cuando el promovente o fraccionador tramite los números oficiales de forma previa a las construcciones, para que el adquirente de los inmuebles reciba las placas correspondientes de los números, deberá presentar el documento en original de la boleta de asignación del número que le entregará el promovente o fraccionador. ARTICULO 1054.- la Dirección de Obras Públicas Municipal autorizará números oficiales al solicitante, cuando el fraccionador o promovente haya cumplido con los requisitos del dictamen de autorización de la Comisión Estatal de Desarrollo Urbano o la Secretaría de Planeación Estatal en el ámbito de su competencia y de la legislación urbana aplicable. ARTICULO 1055.- Son causas de rectificación de número oficial: I.- Cuando la boleta de número oficial contenga errores de asignación; II.- Cuando la numeración en la vía pública, no sea consecutiva o se encuentre duplicada; y III.- Cuando una misma vialidad hubiera tenido varias nomenclaturas y se motive la generalización a una sola. ARTICULO 1056.- Todas las solicitudes deberán de contener los siguientes requisitos: I.- Copia del documento que acredite la propiedad; II.- Copia del último pago predial; III.- Constancia de alineamiento y compatibilidad urbanística; y IV.- Cuando se trate de subdivisiones o fusiones deberá acompañar el documento que acredite la autorización de las mismas según corresponda. ARTICULO 1057.- Son causas de Ratificación de número oficial: Cuando se requiera para comprobar la inexistencia de error en el número oficial así mismo en la nomenclatura, incluyendo la certificación de cambio del nombre en determinado tiempo de una vía pública, se deberá presentar, para poder expedirse este documento, solicitud por escrito ante la Dirección de Obras y Servicios Públicos Municipales, señalando los hechos y motivos que lo apoyan y comprobante que acredite la propiedad del interesado. ARTICULO 1058.- Una vez satisfechos los requisitos que establece el presente Capítulo, la Dirección de Obras Públicas procederá a expedir un documento en el en el (sic) que se incluirá el número oficial y las placas correspondientes, debiendo presentar el original de la boleta y en su caso la constancia de compatibilidad urbanística y la licencia de construcción.